Post 38 - 2005.07.16
China "Ups the Ante" Over East China Sea Energy RightsIn an editorial
in today's China
Daily, Japan's recent award
of East China Sea energy resource drilling rights to Teikoku Oil Co. was characterized in
particularly confrontational terms. (China Daily, published in broad-sheet
format, is China's only national
English-language newspaper.) Today's editorial, titled "Japan's
Dangerous Move in the East China Sea", included the following remarks:
"Japan has unilaterally demarcated a controversial
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) along the "median line," which sits on the Chinese
side of the continental shelf, and on which China enjoys exclusive rights."
"Giving Teikoku the go-ahead to test drill is a move
which makes conflict between the two nations inevitable, though what form this clash will
take is hard to tell."
"Japan's unilateral action to start drilling, which
flies in the face of international maritime laws, is not simply about new sources of
energy. It reveals plainly the country's intention to take our Diaoyu islets for
good."
"...Japan has strayed from the path of dialogue.
If a confrontation were to result, the blame would sit firmly with Japan."
Importantly, this China Daily editorial
was summarized in a prominent article in
today's People's Daily
titled "Japan's Move in East China Sea Makes Conflict 'Inevitable': Report".
People's Daily is the de facto journalistic mouthpiece of China's
communist government.
In our view, a rapidly emerging China will, at
some point, give Japan's military a "bloody nose" in order to establish a new
Asian pecking order. China took a step in this direction in late 2004 when a PLA
Navy submarine violated Japanese territorial waters. Here's an excerpt from page 53
of Laguna Research Partners' 2005.04.14 "Crisis
on the China Rim..." (CCR) analysis:
"...at 05h 40m on November 10, 2004, an unidentified
underwater vessel penetrated Japanese territorial waters in the southwest sector of
Okinawa Prefecture ...the vessel passed Ishigaki and Miyako Islands traveling at
approximately 10 knots ...it returned to Chinese territorial waters roughly two
hours and twenty minutes after its initial incursion into Japanese waters
...Japanese Defense Agency General Yoshinori Ono ordered Japanese Self Defense forces to
pursue the rogue craft at 08h 45m, approximately 45 minutes after the craft had departed
Japanese waters ...following that incursion, a review of intelligence data has led
Japanese officials to conclude that the unidentified submerged craft involved was a
Chinese nuclear-powered submarine ...soon after, China apologized for this
"accidental" incursion ...both the unauthorized incursion into Japanese
waters as well as the slow Japanese military response have rattled officials in Tokyo, and
have heightened demands from conservatives, most notably Foreign Minister Nobutaka
Machimura, for a prompt revision of the Japanese Constitutions pacifist Article IX
...in view of the importance of potential energy reserves under the East China Sea,
this incursion was likely a key factor in Japans decision to broaden its defense
pact with the US to identify Taiwan as one of their 'mutual security concerns'"
We feel, however, that the timing and outcome of
a military skirmish between China and Japan is difficult to forecast given China's
demonstrated tendency to miscalculate in the realm of international affairs.
Posted by:
Kevin B. Skislock
Partner and CEO
Laguna Research Partners
[bio] [disclaimer]
-----
Fair Use Notice: This Weblog ("blog")
page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. Laguna Research Partners LLC believes that this
use constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for by
US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
the material on this Weblog page is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to
view the included material for educational, informational, and/or research purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this Weblog page for purposes that go beyond
"fair use", you must obtain prior permission from the copyright owner. |